Consider a mid-field that looks like this…. « Untold Arsenal: Arsenal News, supporting the club, the players and the manager

By Tony Attwood

Consider a midfield that looks like this:

Cazorla   Oxlade-Chamberlain   Diaby

or

Diaby   Oxlade-Chamberlain   Arteta

or

Oxlade-Chamberlain   Arteta   Wilshere

or

Oxlade-Chamberlain   Wilshere   Cazorla

or

Wilshere   Arteta   Rosicky

or

Wilshere   Diaby   Ramsey

or….

It goes on and on, and I have not even put the fast developing Coquelin in there yet nor come to that Arshavin – who I know is not the favourite of many, but who did have a fine season out on loan in Russia.

My point however is simple.  I can’t recall a time when we had so many choices in midfield.  At the moment I can’t see the equivalent of the Vieira-Petit combination, or the Gilberto-Vieira combination of the Invincibles but what I do know was that during the Invincibles season we did not suffer the sort of injury run that has bedevilled us in recent years.

Which is why there is a new game: a much bigger squad with huge flexibility to allow different selections for different games and different competitions.

So in midfield we have in alphabetical order…

  • Arshavin
  • Arteta
  • Cazorla
  • Coquelin
  • Diaby
  • Oxlade-Chamberlain
  • Ramsey
  • Rosicky
  • Wilshere

Of course Coquelin is just learning the trade, Rosicky can’t play every match, Wilshere’s recovery is taking a long time, but as a range of choices it is extraordinary.

Put Oxlade-Chamberlain in the centre of the midfield and he becomes a box-to-box player.  Play him with Arteta and Wilshere and we would probably have the most powerful midfield in quite a while.  And if Diaby continues his growth, you have another powerhouse, strong on the ball, always finding space.  Play Cazorla along with Oxlade-Chamberlain and Arteta and you have one hell of a combination.

Now, if you accept any of this, then the departure of Song suddenly becomes perfectly reasonable, because we have such a collection of midfield talent.  It also suddenly begins to question whether we actually need any more midfielders at all.

So where does that leave Sahin?  I am having problems fitting the nine players we have into 3 slots – so why bring in a 10th?

The papers in the UK have been saying that Sahin is in fact going to Liverpool, although yesterday the German papers were saying that Sahin had just had a medical at Arsenal.  But I genuinely cannot see why we would want another player in mid-field.

Maybe we were just muddying the waters for Liverpool and making life tough for them.  Who knows, but here’s another little range of figures…

  • Arshavin (31)
  • Arteta (30)
  • Cazorla (27)
  • Coquelin (21)
  • Diaby (26)
  • Oxlade-Chamberlain (19)
  • Ramsey (21)
  • Rosicky (31)
  • Wilshere (20)

That is a very fine mix of ages.   Four players in the 19 to 21 age range, two at 26/27, three at 30+.  The mixture of youth, and experience, what every team should have.

It raises the point as to what a huge range of talent we have to take on different types of club – for if we are covering for injuries we are also looking at ways of beating rugby teams like Stoke, 12 man defences like Sunderland + ref, and football playing teams (if we get to find any).

I’m actually feeling rather good about our mid-field.

——————————

 Our Woolwich Arsenal book nominated for an award

Similar Posts